Faultlines + Swarmia
Swarmia tracks how your team works — DORA, SPACE, cycle time. Faultlines tracks what your team works on — features, hotspots, code health. Combine them and “why is cycle time up?”has a real answer . Use both, or Faultlines alone for the code side.
The engineering-leader tool of choice. DORA, SPACE, and flow metrics with surveys, investment-area breakdowns, and GitHub/Jira/Slack integration. EM and VP Eng audiences trust Swarmia for executive reporting.
- DORA + SPACE + flow metrics
- Sprint cadence + cycle-time dashboards
- Investment-area breakdowns + surveys
- GitHub / Jira / Slack integration
- Built for EM / VP Eng executive reporting
Code-grounded answers instead of survey-based ones. Swarmia tells you “Team A’s cycle time is up 18%.” Faultlines tells you which features are decaying and why the number moved. Different question, same engineering org.
- Feature + flow map of the codebase
- Hotspots, churn, ownership per feature
- Sentry + PostHog attribution per feature
- MCP server for Cursor, Claude Code, Cline, Aider
- Flat per-org pricing from $19/mo
How they actually combine
Just Faultlines, on its own
Faultlines doesn’t do DORA, SPACE, or cycle-time tracking. We don’t do people-metrics. If you want sprint-cadence dashboards for executives, you need Swarmia (or LinearB, or DX). Faultlines focuses on the code side: feature map, hotspots, ownership, runtime correlation. The two together answer “how” + “what.” If you only have budget for one and you’re reporting up to leadership, Swarmia is the natural pick; Faultlines is the natural pick when the question is about code rather than people.
Where each one focuses
| Focus area | Swarmia | Faultlines |
|---|---|---|
| Primary unit | Team + process metrics | Feature + flow map |
| DORA / SPACE metrics | ✓ | — |
| Sprint analytics | ✓ | — |
| Code hotspots | — | ✓ |
| Runtime signal | — | Sentry + PostHog |
| Pricing | Per-contributor | Per-org $19–299/mo |
| Best fit | Engineering org-wide reporting | Code-level + AI-agent context |